Cloud, local, or neither.
Three honest options. One of them is not using AI at all.
Three ways to work with AI, side by side: everything in the cloud, everything on your own computer, or no AI at all.
Which one is sensible depends on how sensitive your files are. Sometimes "no AI" is the right answer — and we say so.
No competitor names, no invented scores — just where each option puts your data.
Do not send your evidence somewhere else to prove it was not tampered with.
- Cloud AI is fine when the material is not confidential and no one will ask you to prove anything.
- No AI is fine when the work is small enough that recall and search are not your bottleneck.
- Provenize fits when confidentiality and provability are both non-negotiable — and you can live with pre-1.0.
Is local AI not much weaker than cloud AI?
The largest models run in the cloud, and we name that difference honestly. But for searching and summarising your own documents, a local model is more than enough — and the only one that makes no copy of your file.
What does cloud AI cost me in control?
You do not know exactly where copies live (text versions, search indexes, back-ups), you cannot verify erasure yourself, and the answer to "where does it say that?" depends on the vendor.
Can I simply use no AI at all?
Certainly — that is the third option in the comparison, and sometimes the right one. You lose speed in search work, but no new risk arises either. We cannot make it more honest than that.
Can you trust an AI answer without a source? — why an answer is only worth something once you can see where it says so. And: is your data really gone at an AI vendor?
Test the claim yourself.
Check the proof